Birleşmiş Milletler (BM) Uluslararası Hukuk Komisyonu (UHK) tarafından oluşturulan Uluslararası Haksız Fiilden Ötürü Devletin Uluslararası Sorumluluğuna İlişkin Maddeler Metni’nin Hukuka Aykırılığı Ortadan Kaldıran Haller başlığının altında 26’ncı maddeye göre “meşrû müdâfaa” uluslararası hukukun emredici bir kuralından kaynaklanan bir yükümlülüğe aykırı herhangi bir devlet fiilinin hukuka aykırılığını ortadan kaldırmaz. Viyana Antlaşmalar Hukuku Konvansiyonu’nun 53’üncü maddesine göre, uluslararası hukukun emredici bir kuralı uluslararası genel hukukun emredici bir normu, bir bütün olarak devletlerin uluslararası toplumunun, kendisinden hiçbir surette sapmaya müsaade edilmeyen ve ancak aynı nitelikte olan daha sonraki bir uluslararası genel hukuk normu ile değiştirilebilecek olan bir norm olarak kabul ettiği ve tanıdığı bir normdur. Çalışmamız 26’ncı maddedeki düzenlemenin uluslararası hukuk bakımından yerini ve değerini incelemektedir.
Established by the United Nations İnternational Law Commission, Responsibility of States for internationally wrongful acts the text relating to Article 26 under the title “self-defense” precludes the wrongfulness of any act of a State which is not in conformity with an obligation arising under a peremptory norm of general international law. According to article 53 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, a treaty is void if, at the time of its conclusion, it conflicts with a peremptory norm of general international law. For the purposes of the present Convention, a peremptory norm of general international law is a norm accepted and recognized by the international community of States as a whole as a norm from which no derogation is permitted and which can be modified only by a subsequent norm of general international law having the same character. Our study examines the place and value of article 26's regulation in international law.
Established by the United Nations İnternational Law Commission, Responsibility of States for internationally wrongful acts the text relating to Article 26 under the title “self-defense” precludes the wrongfulness of any act of a State which is not in conformity with an obligation arising under a peremptory norm of general international law. According to article 53 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, a treaty is void if, at the time of its conclusion, it conflicts with a peremptory norm of general international law. For the purposes of the present Convention, a peremptory norm of general international law is a norm accepted and recognized by the international community of States as a whole as a norm from which no derogation is permitted and which can be modified only by a subsequent norm of general international law having the same character. Our study examines the place and value of article 26's regulation in international law.
https://www.academia.edu/38088916/Hakk%C4%B1_Hakan_Erkiner_Bildiri_Birle%C5%9Fmi%C5%9F_Milletler_Uluslararas%C4%B1_Hukuk_Komisyonu_nun_Devletin_Sorumlulu%C4%9Fu_%C3%9Czerine_Maddeler_Projesinin_26_nc%C4%B1_Maddesi_Uyar%C4%B1nca_Emredici_Kurallara_Sayg%C4%B1_ve_Me%C5%9Fr%C3%BB_M%C3%BCd%C3%A2faa_%C4%B0li%C5%9Fkisi_%C3%9Czerine_%C4%B0nceleme_-_United_Nations_%C4%B0nternational_Law_Commission_s_Article_Review..._
YanıtlaSil